What this policy does
Implements the privacy-protection requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, which governs documents filed in U.S. district courts in civil matters. The rule requires that filings include only:
| Original PII | Permitted in filing |
|---|---|
| Social Security number | last 4 digits |
| Taxpayer identification number | last 4 digits |
| Date of birth | year only |
| Name of a minor | initials only |
| Financial account number | last 4 digits |
This policy is the federal-civil sibling of rule-9037-bankruptcy (which covers FRBP 9037 for bankruptcy filings). The redaction rules are identical between the two; the difference is which courts they apply in. Use this policy for federal district court civil matters; use the 9037 policy for bankruptcy.
This policy enforces those rules automatically:
- SSNs and TINs — masked to last 4 (e.g.,
xxxxxxx6789). - Financial account numbers — masked to last 4. The regex matches
ACCT 1234567890,Account: 1234567890, etc. - Birthdates — truncated to the 4-digit year. The
context == "birth"condition only triggers on dates associated with a birth (DOB, “born”, etc.) — other dates in the filing (hearings, transaction dates) pass through. - Minors’ names — replaced with initials. The
context == "minor"condition relies on Philter detecting minor-related context (e.g., “minor child”, “the minor”, “juvenile”). For high-precision deployments, also configure a custom dictionary of known minor names.
When to use this
- Civil complaints and answers
- Motions and supporting declarations filed with personal information from parties, witnesses, or third parties
- Discovery responses being filed with the court (note: most discovery is served between parties and not filed; only filed discovery is in scope)
- Trial and pretrial submissions that include the protected categories
- Any document filed in a U.S. district court civil case that originated outside the court system
Specialized federal proceedings have their own rules that supersede FRCP 5.2:
- Bankruptcy — use
rule-9037-bankruptcyinstead. - Criminal — Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1 (similar but not identical scope).
- Immigration / administrative — court-specific rules.
When to customize
- Account number format. The default
\bACCT[\s:#]*\d{6,}\bis illustrative. Replace with the specific patterns your case management system uses. - TIN format. The default matches the
XX-XXXXXXXEIN format. ITINs follow9XX-XX-XXXXand are caught by the SSN filter (since they share the SSN format). - Minor detection. If your filings have a structured field for minor names, add a custom
sectionfilter to redact the entire section content. - Per-rule overrides. FRCP 5.2(d) allows filing unredacted documents under seal with court permission. This policy assumes you want full redaction — if you’re preparing a filing for the protected order, use a less aggressive variant or pass through unmodified.
- Court-specific local rules. Many district courts have local rules that supplement FRCP 5.2 (e.g., redacting witness home addresses, redacting alien-registration numbers in immigration-related matters). Layer those on top of this baseline.
Compliance notes
- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 has been in effect since December 1, 2007. It applies to all documents filed with the U.S. district courts in civil matters.
- This policy implements only the privacy-protection redactions required by FRCP 5.2(a). It does not handle the additional sealing or restricted-access provisions of FRCP 5.2(d) (motion to file under seal) or 5.2(e) (additional protections by court order).
- FRCP 5.2(b) provides several exemptions — the redaction requirements do not apply to financial-account numbers identifying the property allegedly subject to forfeiture, the record of an administrative or agency proceeding, the official record of a state-court proceeding, the record of a court or tribunal if not subject to the privacy-protection rule, or filings covered by 5.2(c) (Social Security or immigration-related cases). Configure exemption handling in your filing workflow; this policy does not automatically detect those contexts.
- Attorneys remain responsible for the accuracy of their filings. This policy is a tool to reduce manual redaction work, not a substitute for attorney review.